NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Turning Off the GPS
From: Lu Abel
Date: 2006 Apr 5, 08:31 -0700
From: Lu Abel
Date: 2006 Apr 5, 08:31 -0700
Marcel: You are absolutely right about the EU developing EUREKA (and I can fully understand the EU's desire to field a system under their own control). But Gordon's "we need to keep our sextant skills up" note was addressed to the idea of *terrorists* disabling GPS, not the US government. As a practical matter, GPS has become deeply embedded in 21st century life. For at least the past decade people have regarded the ability to accurately determine one's position as a new, universal utility. That was one of the reasons for disabling Selective Availability. WAAS is a precursor to GPS being used as a new paradigm for air traffic routing. In the US all new cell phones are now required to give positional information to 100 meters or less. While there are a number of techniques for doing this (eg, triangulation), one of the most successful and widely adopted is embedding a GPS receiver in the cell phone. GPS-based mapping systems are one of the most popular options on new cars. I even have been told that John Deere is experimenting with driverless, GPS-directed tractors for plowing farmer's fields! And on and on... At this point, it would be difficult for even the most paranoid US leader to turn off GPS. As a specific example, I'll note that Selective Availability was not re-enabled after 9/11. Lu Abel Marcel Tschudin wrote: > Please correct me if I should be wrong: Since GPS is controlled by the > US military it only needs a decision from the US administration to swich > it off. This is, to my understanding, the reason why Europe decided to > set in place their own system called EUREKA. > > Marcel > > > On 4/5/06, *Lu Abel*> > wrote: > > With all respect, Gordon, it would take a lot more technology than the > terrorists have to turn off GPS much less to make it give incorrect > positions. GPS uses satellites. One would need satellite-killer > missiles to "turn off" GPS. Only two or three countries (USA, Russia, > China?) have the technology (which, BTW, includes the technology and > infrastructure to track and identify the target before saying to the > missile "go get 'em"). To make GPS give the wrong position would > require taking over the US's GPS control centers and I'm sure the US > military has put a lot of thought and effort into preventing that. > > There are GPS jammers available on the arms market, but they work only > over a small theater of operations. Nowhere I'd be sailing, hope you > won't be there either. > > Last but not least, terrorists are interested in, well, terror. I > suspect they'd far rather kill a few thousand of their perceived enemies > than inconvenience them by turning off GPS.... > > Lu Abel > > Gordon Talge wrote: > > Just for the heck of it, I wonder what would happen, > > if some terrorists managed to turn off the GPS system, or > > maybe even better, have it give the wrong positions. > > > > I have noticed that a lot of people seem to say they keep > > a sextant and tables, etc, for backup. The problem that I > > see with that is it takes a lot of practice to get good at using a > > sextant and working out sights by hand. Someone who has > > only tried out their sextant on a calm day or on the beach, > > may find it hard to get a decent shot on a pitching boat > > or ship, and then work out a sight where one slip of a > > plus or minus, or wrong column, would make it all for naught. > > > > BTW, > > > > Has anyone seen those German films of the U-Boats during World War II > > in the North Atlantic pitching and rolling? I start getting seasick > > just watching it. I saw one where a German Officer was taking a noon > > sight on a sub like that. They may have been the enemy, but they > > sure had guts. (It took guts to stand up to them too) > > > > -- Gordon > > > > > >