NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: UTM question
From: Paul Hirose
Date: 2014 Mar 02, 23:24 -0800
From: Paul Hirose
Date: 2014 Mar 02, 23:24 -0800
Greg R_ wrote: > I've been getting up to speed on the UTM grid system, and have a question that I haven't been able to find an answer to: Since the northings are based relative to the equator, why do we need more than 2 northing zones (1 north and 1 south) for the non-polar regions? We don't. For example, if northing is a big number, you're either in the northern hemisphere and far north, or in the southern hemisphere and near the equator. In practice that's not much ambiguity! Nevertheless, on my scanner I hear search and rescue teams incluing a latitudinal zone letter in their UTMs. I suspect these people are using Garmin GPS receivers. None of my Magellans displays the latitudinal zone letter with UTM coords. If you enter a waypoint, they only need you to specify northern or southern hemisphere. Another silly Garmin-ism is to show easting and northing coordinates with the same number of digits. But easting is always less than 500 000 meters, while northing can be millions. Thus there's always a useless leading zero on easting. It's like displaying degrees of latitude with three digits. The leading digit will always be zero. I know someone who wrote Garmin to point out their illogical UTM format. They never responded. To be fair, my info is several years old. I'm not familiar with their current receivers. Latitudinal zone letters *are* needed in MGRS coordinates, which are based on the same grid as UTM but written in a much different format. --