NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
From: Jerry Mason
Date: 2016 Apr 11, 14:24 -0700
Hi Paul, I read your analysis with interest. Thank you very much for sharing it. I can see how that the corrections for time and latitude can be a source of error. In my opinion, the biggest drawback to the use of the F-Tafle (compared to the similar H.O. 208) is the frequent and sometimes tricky interpolation that is required. As a beginner, I am uncomfortable with estimating and so take up a lot of time doing the interpolation mathematically. With the corrections for time and latitude sometimes a double interpolation is required. The U-boat navigator must have gone through a lot of scrap paper and graph paper. The 1941 Nautical Almanac also requires considerable interpolation. I guess it was a way of making the tables as compact as possible. It certainly makes one appreciate the modern Almanac and inspection table sight reduction tables like H.O. 229/249. Jerry