NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Ulugh Beg's sextant
From: Doug Royer
Date: 2006 Mar 24, 12:56 -0800
From: Doug Royer
Date: 2006 Mar 24, 12:56 -0800
Thanks Fred. Helps if one does a search under the proper title to get results. I now know what this sextant looks like and how it was used. Interesting. Here's a link for anyone interested: http://silkpress.com/archive/discovery/autumn2005.ulugbek.shtml Doug, I can't help you out much with most of your questions, but one comment is that the device probably was not a sextant in that it probably did not employ the double reflection principle. I would expect it was a sighting tube of some kind, oriented in the north- south axis, which could be pointed at various elevations to read off the meridian altitude of a star directly. A quick Google search confirmed this conjecture. Fred On Mar 24, 2006, at 1:35 PM, Royer, Doug wrote: > Ok, I'm now reading a very good book dealing with observatories > past and present. > > There is an interesting chapter on the Samarkand Observatory in > Uzbekistan that Ulugh Beg built and used for astronomical > observations in the 1400's. > > There is a crude description of the FAKHRI SEXTANT used by the > Samarkand Observatory that was used to measure the position of > thousands of stars to within a few seconds of arc. It has a radius > of 120 ft. > > After a quick search on the web today for pictures or a better > description of this sextant I came up dry. There are a few pictures > of parts of the observatory but none that are identified as the > Fakhri sextant. > > There is 1 picture of a section of a structure which has 1 vertical > stone wall on each side of a center groove and 2 stone tracks > running in a vertical arc between the 2 walls on either side of the > center groove. > > I had pictured this "sextant" as kind of matching how Stonehenge is > constructed for celestial observations. But now I'm more interested > than ever to find what this "sextant" really looks like. > > Frank, because you're an astronomer, can you help or point me in > the proper direction to get a better understanding of what this > looks like? Visually or at least a better written description. Or > can anyone else help out in this quest? > > > >