NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Unexpected USNO height correction precepts
From: Paul Hirose
Date: 2018 Sep 25, 21:03 -0700
From: Paul Hirose
Date: 2018 Sep 25, 21:03 -0700
I added an option to make my SofaJpl demonstration program give apparent coordinates of the center of light instead of center of mass. This affects only my personal version, not the source code online at the SofaJpl page. I may add this option to the next revision of the Lunar4 program. The example of Antoine, worked both ways: 1977-03-18 00:02:17.00 UT1 +47.52s delta T -27°35.00' 144°53.70' N lat, E lon 4.6 meters above ellipsoid geocentric apparent GHA, dec 156°08.50' +16°19.01' center of mass 156°08.77' +16°18.83' center of light topocentric apparent azimuth and elevation (unrefracted) 59°49.46' 17°57.67' center of mass 59°49.46' 17°57.98' center of light 0.31' from center of mass to center of light 0.42' topocentric apparent semidiameter To practical accuracy, the above two values add directly, since the position angle of the Sun with respect to Venus is 1° (0 = the direction to the zenith). Thus, the center of light is displaced almost exactly upward, and there is a 0.73' altitude discrepancy between the lower limb and center of light. Computation with JPL DE431 ephemeris, IAU 2006/00B precession/nutation. Delta T from the spline fit to observed data by Stephenson et al (2016). Since the time scale of this example is UT1 and the body is Venus (very slow motion compared to the Moon), any discrepancy in delta T should have insignificant effect. The Astronomical Almanac delta T table in section K says 47.52 at 1977.0, identical to my value. That illustrates the convenience of the SofaJpl DeltaT class. It's at hand if desired, but does not interfere if you prefer to supply your own value.