NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Using star-star distances
From: Bill B
Date: 2008 Sep 22, 21:38 -0400
From: Bill B
Date: 2008 Sep 22, 21:38 -0400
George Huxtable wrote: > > Those pages and tables need to be taken with a pinch of salt, however. Most of my reference book are in storage, but as I recall Bauer also had star-to-star parings in his sextant book, again to be taken with a (large) grain of salt. George does well in pointing out some of the problems inherent with look-up tables. If you are truly serious about calibrating your sextant within 0!1 to 0!2 your results can be no better than your target accuracy. Now if for some reason all the pairings from 120d to 10d agreed with your calculations, with the exception all of being 0!5 off in one direction, you might have case for index or system/personal error. That would assume the scale was perfect, a rather large leap of faith. A sanity check helps. One evening Alex and I were doing star-to-star, one pairing in the 90d range. He was on, I kept coming up 1' off, despite other pairings being on. We swapped sextants, I hit the mark with his and he was 1' off with mine. That pretty much tells the tale. Not an IC problem, not personal error, so definitely a scale error. (Unless of course the optics of my scope were shifting because of the star's light wavelength and his was not ;-) Bill B. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Navigation List archive: www.fer3.com/arc To post, email NavList@fer3.com To , email NavList-@fer3.com -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---