NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
From: Greg Rudzinski
Date: 2014 May 8, 12:58 -0700
Bill,
If an azimuth were taken at the same time as a prime vertical observation then the assumed longitude could be replaced by that of the reduced LOP. Meridian angle is then improved so that a more exact calculated azimuth can be determined by formula:
Z = (Cos d) (Sin t) / (Cos Ho)
Greg Rudzinski
Re: Using sun compass for calibrating boat compass
From: Bill B
Date: 2014 May 08, 13:35 -0400
On 5/8/2014 9:51 AM, Greg Rudzinski wrote:
> The way I see this is that Hc is based on an assumed position not the
> actual position so that the azimuths will differ slightly. Not an issue
> for the LOP plot. But if an accurate fiber optic gyro were to be checked
> to it's precision then I would use Ho (not Hc or Hs)to calculate azimuth
> to the tenth of a degree.
Sean and Greg
Thanks for your input. I do see your points, but still feel like a puppy
chasing its own tail.
If I understand correctly, in the following formula I would still be
working from an assumed position as the LHA is derived from the GHA and
AP longitude, so your caveats are still valid:
Tan Z = sin LHA / ((cos LHA sin lat) - (cos lat tan dec))
If tan Z is negative, add 180 to Z
If hour angle is less than 180, add another 180 to Z
If the scenario was similar to Greg's post from the archives, and I was
working from about a known position (Ho and Hc theoretically equal),
then the azimuth derived from the Hc or Ho would yield the correct azimuth.
Have I caught up to my tail yet :-)
----------------------------------------------------------------
NavList message boards and member settings: www.fer3.com/NavList
Members may optionally receive posts by email.
To cancel email delivery, send a message to NoMail[at]fer3.com
----------------------------------------------------------------