NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Value and Beauty are in the eye of the beholder
From: Bill B
Date: 2006 Apr 1, 00:39 -0500
From: Bill B
Date: 2006 Apr 1, 00:39 -0500
Guy wrote, regarding Astra IIIB > we will get to the whole mirror VS. the traditional mirror next. Please reconsider the whole-horizon mirror, although you could swap out later From my experience, strongly consider new from Celestaire or other vendors of their Astra. You won't find better (or more informed) folks to do business with before, during, and after the sale than Celestaire IMHO. I am not a shill, but a satisfied customer in an age of "limited warrantees." As some have pointed out, a whole horizon mirror makes easy observations easier, and difficult observations much harder. If you get the "list" bug, as I did (especially if landlocked most of the time), you will soon find yourself trying star-to-star and lunars, and regret the whole-horizon choice. If I recall correctly, Ken of Celestaire stated that 90% of working observations are of the sun. He does know his stuff. With that in mind, from my vantage point his opinions about mirrors are balanced. http://celestaire.com/page8.html David Burch of Star Path also sells Celestaire's Astra. His opinions, IMHO, are unfavorable to the whole horizon mirror for valid reasons. Please check out their opinions for yourself and draw your own conclusions. http://www.starpath.com/catalog/courses/cel_faqs.htm#full-view As a beginner, it was a tough choice for me. In my case I am glad I made the choice of traditional split mirror (especially trying to go toe-to-toe with the mighty Alex and his Sno-T in the dark;-) For what it is worth, Bill