NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
From: Brad Morris
Date: 2014 Jan 21, 17:19 -0500
Jürgen
That formula apparently does not include arc division errors. It appears to only include a concentricity error.
Arc division would not necessarily be a smooth error curve.
Brad
There is another paper on sextant correction tables in The Journal of Navigation. See attached2014/1/21 Brad Morris <bradley.r.morris---.com>
Dave
Doesn't that conflict with the certificate you just presented?
The error at 120° is 1'0". The article states 40" is the upper limit for Class A.
Does this mean the requirements changed over time?
Brad
On Jan 21, 2014 4:18 PM, "Dave Walden" <waldendand---.com> wrote:Here's some numbers:
*****************Journal of Navigation
Journal of Navigation / Volume 1 / Issue 03 / July 1948, pp 266-268Copyright © The Royal Institute of Navigation 1948 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0373463300027685 (About DOI), Published online: 18 January 2010
New Content Alerts
CJO Widget
About Widget
Rss
Atom
Table of Contents - 1948 - Volume 1, Issue 03 Author Index
Buy This Article
$45.00 / £30.00
Request Permissions Previous Abstract Next Abstract
Research Article
A Critical Table for Sextant Corrections
J. P. G. Worlledge
It is the present usage by the National Physical Laboratory and the Trade to give, on its Certificate, the ‘constant’ (graduation and centring) errors of a sextant only at stated points on the scale. If these errors are of a magnitude which is worth while applying as a correction, this usage is not quite what the user requires. The N.P.L. Class A Test, issued for instruments reading directly to 10″ (or o′·2 in the case of decimal subdivision) allows combined graduation and centring error up to 40″ or 4 scale divisions of the micrometer or vernier; the Class B Test for instruments graduated to 20″ permits such error up to 2′ or 6 scale divisions. Thus, even with instruments that pass these tests, it may be worth the marine navigator's while to apply the error as a correction. What he wants to know, however, are the limits of such errors as are worth his while to apply. In other words, he requires a Critical Table of Corrections, of the type used in the Air Almanac and in certain mathematical tables by L. J. Comrie, by whom, it is understood, the method was introduced.
----------------------------------------------------------------
NavList message boards and member settings: www.fer3.com/NavList
Members may optionally receive posts by email.
To cancel email delivery, send a message to NoMail[at]fer3.com
----------------------------------------------------------------Attached File:
(img/126608.sextant correction.jpg: Open and save)