Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    Name or NavList Code:
    Email:
       
    Reply
    Re: What is better 5 times 3 or 3 times 5 sights?
    From: Robin Stuart
    Date: 2022 Oct 11, 08:40 -0700

    If the procedures being considered are

    • 1) Take 5 sights of each of 3 objects. Average each of the sets of 5 sights and draw 3 LOPs
    • 2) Take 3 sights of each of 5 objects. Average each of the sets of 3 sights and draw 5 LOPs

    Which one is better?

    If the errors are Gaussian then there are some fairly simple expressions that can be obtained for area of the confidence ellipse and root-mean-square distance of possible positions from the Most Probable Position (MPP). Either of these can serve as a useful figure of merit (smaller is better) to evaluate a round of sights and can be found in Appendix C of my paper Probabilities in a Gaussian Cocked Hat . They depend on the azimuths of the objects being observed ( Z1, Z2, Z3,...) and the standard deviation of the error associated each sight ( σ1, σ2, σ3,...). Any conclusions will therefore depend on the specifics of the round of sights. As discussed in the attached document the two key quantities that go into these figures of merit are Tr A33 and |A33|


    Let's assume that σ is the same for each of the sights and the azimuths are equally distributed around the horizon at intervals of 120° for case 1 and 72° for case 2. It turns out that the key quantities are equal in both case 1 and case 2 and hence the two procedures are equally good. In a way we might have expected this. More generally for n sights with equal errors of each of m objects distributed at equal azimuth intervals around horizon the key quantities are Tr A33 = mn/(2σ2) and |A33|=(mn/(4σ2))2.


    On somewhat related note: Both of the figures of merit mentioned above are inversely proportional to the square root of |A33|. From that it follows that if you want to chose 3 objects with which to form a cocked hat, as is done in some sets of tables, then you should choose the 3 objects for which sin2(Z1-Z2)+sin2(Z2-Z3)+sin2(Z3-Z1) is largest.


    Robin Stuart

    File:
    ConfidenceEllipses.pdf
       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Get a NavList ID Code

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    A NavList ID Code guarantees your identity in NavList posts and allows faster posting of messages.

    Retrieve a NavList ID Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your NavList code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    NavList ID Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site