NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
The Zen of Sextant Navigation
From: Mike Hannibal
Date: 2005 Oct 15, 08:46 +1000
From: Mike Hannibal
Date: 2005 Oct 15, 08:46 +1000
This might be better suited to "alt.culture.sextant" or somesuch. If it's not really a topic for here I apologise. It seems to me that sextant navigation has an aesthetic component to it. That the use of the instrument, the feel and look of the instrument and the "directness" of sighting on an object and getting a position line are part of an aesthetic which provides some of the motivation for at least some of us to continue to do this. In photography the closest analogue I can identify is with people who use Leica rangefinder cameras. The look, feel and functionality of these cameras, together with the connection to history and the way they dictate picture taking are all part of the reason people use them. There's not much difference between the first Leica rangefinder in the 20s and a 2005 model. Not to mention the mystique of these cameras. Any rational person would probably use something with lots of LEDs, LCDs and buttons and batteries. Quite a large number of people don't however and they feel very passionate about not using such instruments. The same applies to sextants and GPS units. It's a bit hard to feel much for a GPS unit but I'm sure many of us feel something for our sextants. Are sextant navigators also Leica rangefinder users? Is there an aesthetic that is part of our attachment to this art/craft/science? Are we luddites who insist on "Mechanical Perfection" as opposed to "electronic mysticism"? Or are we all just pragmatic navigators. I'd be interested in your responses. And you can no doubt see that I have too much time on my hands this morning. Now really to the boat this beautiful morning. Regards Mike ____________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Photos: Now with unlimited storage http://au.photos.yahoo.com