NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: The backstaff. was: Re: The Shovell disaster
From: Michael Daly
Date: 2007 Nov 06, 11:35 -0500
From: Michael Daly
Date: 2007 Nov 06, 11:35 -0500
Nicol�s de Hilster wrote: > Yesterday I have been out in the field testing several instruments: A > demi-cross, Master Hood's cross-staff, a cross-staff (used in the Dutch > fashion) and a Davis Quadrant. I'd be interested in seeing a photo or diagram of Master Hood's cross-staff. Have you hidden it on your web site? I've never heard of this instrument and can't find any info on it. > From this test it also became clear that the cross-staff and demi-cross > perform similarly, but giving excellent results (average error 2 arc > minutes over all data). The Davis Quadrant remains the winner when > comparing handling, something that can be seen from the amount of data > collected from it. None of the period instruments tested so far gives a > better feel and quicker observations. This also explains the popularity > of the instrument. The knowledge that the Davis quadrant "feels good" is a significant thing. Mike --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to NavList@fer3.com To , send email to NavList-@fer3.com -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---