NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: dip, dip short, distance off with buildings, etc.
From: Frank Reed CT
Date: 2006 Jan 11, 00:30 EST
From: Frank Reed CT
Date: 2006 Jan 11, 00:30 EST
Bill you wrote: "I have done three trial runs with the new values, and they seem to approach reality with the average of mean refraction values derived from the two methods above, a least when height of eye is 0." Can you elaborate on this 'reality' you speak of?Seriously, how are you assessing the results. -FER 42.0N 87.7W, or 41.4N 72.1W. www.HistoricalAtlas.com/lunars