Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    Name or NavList Code:
    Email:
       
    Reply
    Re: lunar parallax killed Amelia Earhart
    From: Doug Royer
    Date: 2006 May 17, 11:16 -0700

    Paul, I read a great book about this around a year ago. I can't remember the
    title but will try to find it and pass it on to you or the group. That and
    other mistakes in radio frequencies used and monitored by both the vessels
    and the plane on approach to the area. Also, one of the compounding mistakes
    could have been as simple as calculating the incorrect time of sunrise thus
    throwing Amelia and Noonan off by enough miles that when they made their
    north-south run to sight the island they were not close enough.
    Interesting read.
    
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Navigation Mailing List [mailto:NAVIGATION-L@LISTSERV.WEBKAHUNA.COM]
    On Behalf Of Paul Hirose
    Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2006 7:20 PM
    To: NAVIGATION-L@LISTSERV.WEBKAHUNA.COM
    Subject: lunar parallax killed Amelia Earhart
    
    This web page speculates that Amelia Earhart and Fred Noonan missed
    Howland Island because Noonan failed to correct for parallax when he
    shot the Moon:
    
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/h2g2/A3694854
    
    On the other hand, engineer Fredrick Hooven wrote that Earhart's
    decision to utilize a lighter and less sophisticated radio direction
    finder was probably a fatal mistake:
    
    http://www.tighar.org/Projects/Earhart/Documents/Hooven_Report/HoovenReport.
    html
    
    "Unfortunately the direction finder was unable to tell which direction
    to turn to go toward Howland due to the ambiguity of its loop signal."
    However, temporarily changing course 90 degrees and watching the bearing
    drift aft would soon resolve the ambiguity. It's hard to believe Earhart
    and Noonan would not know that.
    
    For another point of view, the next article blames the Coast Guard
    cutter Itasca at Howland Island for 1) failing to transmit a beacon
    signal on 500 kHz, and 2) bungling the search when it became clear the
    plane was down.
    
    http://www.usni.org/NavalHistory/Articles00/nhriley.htm
    
    Point #1 looks shaky to me -- several times Earhart requested that
    Itasca take a bearing on her aircraft, but as far as I've seen, she made
    no request that a homing signal be transmitted on 500 kHz.
    
    
    Interestingly, Earhart planned to carry two navigators on her round the
    world flight:
    
    http://www.unmuseum.org/earhart.htm
    
    But due to a two month delay while damage from a takeoff accident was
    repaired, the other navigator had to drop out of the project. Later, he
    must have felt rather like that deck officer who got bumped off the
    Titanic crew right before sailing!
    
    
    

       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Get a NavList ID Code

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    A NavList ID Code guarantees your identity in NavList posts and allows faster posting of messages.

    Retrieve a NavList ID Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your NavList code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    NavList ID Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site