NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: lunar parallax killed Amelia Earhart
From: Doug Royer
Date: 2006 May 17, 11:16 -0700
From: Doug Royer
Date: 2006 May 17, 11:16 -0700
Paul, I read a great book about this around a year ago. I can't remember the title but will try to find it and pass it on to you or the group. That and other mistakes in radio frequencies used and monitored by both the vessels and the plane on approach to the area. Also, one of the compounding mistakes could have been as simple as calculating the incorrect time of sunrise thus throwing Amelia and Noonan off by enough miles that when they made their north-south run to sight the island they were not close enough. Interesting read. -----Original Message----- From: Navigation Mailing List [mailto:NAVIGATION-L@LISTSERV.WEBKAHUNA.COM] On Behalf Of Paul Hirose Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2006 7:20 PM To: NAVIGATION-L@LISTSERV.WEBKAHUNA.COM Subject: lunar parallax killed Amelia Earhart This web page speculates that Amelia Earhart and Fred Noonan missed Howland Island because Noonan failed to correct for parallax when he shot the Moon: http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/h2g2/A3694854 On the other hand, engineer Fredrick Hooven wrote that Earhart's decision to utilize a lighter and less sophisticated radio direction finder was probably a fatal mistake: http://www.tighar.org/Projects/Earhart/Documents/Hooven_Report/HoovenReport. html "Unfortunately the direction finder was unable to tell which direction to turn to go toward Howland due to the ambiguity of its loop signal." However, temporarily changing course 90 degrees and watching the bearing drift aft would soon resolve the ambiguity. It's hard to believe Earhart and Noonan would not know that. For another point of view, the next article blames the Coast Guard cutter Itasca at Howland Island for 1) failing to transmit a beacon signal on 500 kHz, and 2) bungling the search when it became clear the plane was down. http://www.usni.org/NavalHistory/Articles00/nhriley.htm Point #1 looks shaky to me -- several times Earhart requested that Itasca take a bearing on her aircraft, but as far as I've seen, she made no request that a homing signal be transmitted on 500 kHz. Interestingly, Earhart planned to carry two navigators on her round the world flight: http://www.unmuseum.org/earhart.htm But due to a two month delay while damage from a takeoff accident was repaired, the other navigator had to drop out of the project. Later, he must have felt rather like that deck officer who got bumped off the Titanic crew right before sailing!