NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: lunars with and without altitudes
From: Frank Reed CT
Date: 2006 Nov 30, 03:20 EST
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to NavList@fer3.com
To , send email to NavList-@fer3.com
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
From: Frank Reed CT
Date: 2006 Nov 30, 03:20 EST
George, you wrote:
"I presume that in Frank's proposal, the converse process is being
used; that by measuring the displacement of the Moon from its computed
geocentric position, its altitude is being deduced, without benefit of
horizon. Have I got that right?"
used; that by measuring the displacement of the Moon from its computed
geocentric position, its altitude is being deduced, without benefit of
horizon. Have I got that right?"
Oy! No. I will try to get back into this tomorrow. I just can't see any
point right now. Consider re-reading my initial posts on this topic from early
October (around October 5-12). They're in the archive: www.fer3.com/arc.
-FER
42.0N 87.7W, or 41.4N 72.1W.
www.HistoricalAtlas.com/lunars
42.0N 87.7W, or 41.4N 72.1W.
www.HistoricalAtlas.com/lunars
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to NavList@fer3.com
To , send email to NavList-@fer3.com
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
