NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
(no subject)
From: Mike Merriman
Date: 2006 Feb 28, 13:37 -0500
From: Mike Merriman
Date: 2006 Feb 28, 13:37 -0500
please title messages. If for any reason this bounces, please feel free to use: Mike.Merriman@alumni.tufts.edu ----- Original Message ----- From: "Fred Hebard"To: Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2006 1:30 PM > Greg, > > Welcome! > > Mirrors have to be very precisely leveled. There has been much > discussion of this on the list, which is in the archives. Another > alternative is to use a liquid and let gravity level it. Unless you > are up against the shore near tall mountains, such as along the South > American coast, gravity gives a very fine level surface to liquids; > the same shortcoming would also apply to bubble levels used to level > a mirror. I use a Davis-brand artificial horizon, and fill it with > dark Caro-brand corn syrup overlain with a thin layer of vegetable > oil. I'm not sure that Polaris will be easy to see in the horizon, > but bright stars such as Sirius, Vega, etc are easy to see, plus the > planets, sun and moon. Typically, I can get positions within > 0.2-0.3' of arc, and sometimes under 0.1' of arc. That is pretty > close to the limits of resolution of the sextant (0.05' of arc with > an artificial horizon. For objects moving fairly rapidly across the > sky, timing the sight accurately is an important component of overall > accuracy. This would be less true for Polaris, should you be able to > see it in the horizon. Mounting the sextant on a tripod would also > facilitate precise observations. > > Yours Truly, > > Fred Hebard > > > On Feb 28, 2006, at 12:44 PM, cfi@licfi.com wrote: > >> Good Day to the List! >> My name is Greg & I have an interest in historical navigation. In >> addition >> to enjoying >> sailing I belong to a local Rev. War group, where I have the >> persona of a >> surveyor. >> Since surveyors also had to know how to determine lat/Lon I have >> started to >> teach myself the Basics. At this point I have hit a small snag. It >> should >> be pretty straight forward to shoot Polaris But living inland I >> need to use >> a artificial horizon a "well leveled mirror" as the books put it, >> and I >> can't seem to come any closer than 3-4 NM. The sextant I am using is a >> MAC(" Measure All Co. " - Japan ) that I bought off of a retiring >> blue >> water boater on eBay; it seems to be in quite good condition, and I >> think >> $250 was a fair price. All I can think is that there is something >> wrong >> with the way I am setting it up. May I ask for some guidance please: >> >> >> Why does the star look "smeared" through the mirror & 'OK' >> during >> a normal horizon sight? >> >> How optically flat does the mirror really need to be? >> >> How close (or far away) from the mirror should you need to be? >> >> Is a good quality carpenter?s level accurate enough? >> >> >> Many thanks to the list in advance! >> -Greg >> >> >> >> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >> mail2web - Check your email from the web at >> http://mail2web.com/ . >