NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: polaris dec
From: Greg R_
Date: 2006 May 19, 10:41 -0700
From: Greg R_
Date: 2006 May 19, 10:41 -0700
Hi Greg (what's that echo in here?.... ;-)) If you're asking why the declination of the (suppposed) pole star isn't exactly 90 degrees - well, that's because it really isn't. Polaris is close to having a 90?N declination, but it isn't exact and it's off by enough to throw off your navigtion calculations by several miles. Remember that 0.1 degree = 1 NM, so 60' - 18' = 42 NM - not exactly what I'd call "accurate" navigation, but probably close enough to help get you oriented if you're *totally* lost somewhere... ;-) -- GregR ----- Original Message ----- From: "cfi@licfi.com"To: Sent: Friday, May 19, 2006 9:53 AM Subject: polaris dec > Question for the list: > > Please excuse the neophite question but; Why does the USNO on-line > almanac show the following?: > > declination of polaris: > month d m > may 89.17.5 > june 89.17.4 > july 89.17.3 > aug 89.17.3 > sept 89.17.4 > oct 89.17.6 > nov 89.17.7 > dec 89.17.9 > -------2007------ > jan 89.18.1 > feb 89.18.1 > mar 89.18.1 > apr 89.18.0 > may 89.17.8 > june 89.17.7 > july 89.17.6 > > Thanks, > Greg > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > mail2web - Check your email from the web at > http://mail2web.com/ . >