NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: polaris dec
From: Fred Hebard
Date: 2006 May 19, 15:07 -0400
From: Fred Hebard
Date: 2006 May 19, 15:07 -0400
Just as a note, 1 arcminute equals 1 nautical mile. Greg has the calculation right however. On May 19, 2006, at 1:41 PM, Greg R. wrote: > Hi Greg (what's that echo in here?.... ;-)) > > If you're asking why the declination of the (suppposed) pole star > isn't > exactly 90 degrees - well, that's because it really isn't. > > Polaris is close to having a 90?N declination, but it isn't exact > and it's > off by enough to throw off your navigtion calculations by several > miles. > Remember that 0.1 degree = 1 NM, so 60' - 18' = 42 NM - not exactly > what I'd > call "accurate" navigation, but probably close enough to help get you > oriented if you're *totally* lost somewhere... ;-) > > -- > GregR > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "cfi@licfi.com"> To: > Sent: Friday, May 19, 2006 9:53 AM > Subject: polaris dec > > >> Question for the list: >> >> Please excuse the neophite question but; Why does the USNO on-line >> almanac show the following?: >> >> declination of polaris: >> month d m >> may 89.17.5 >> june 89.17.4 >> july 89.17.3 >> aug 89.17.3 >> sept 89.17.4 >> oct 89.17.6 >> nov 89.17.7 >> dec 89.17.9 >> -------2007------ >> jan 89.18.1 >> feb 89.18.1 >> mar 89.18.1 >> apr 89.18.0 >> may 89.17.8 >> june 89.17.7 >> july 89.17.6 >> >> Thanks, >> Greg >> >> >> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >> mail2web - Check your email from the web at >> http://mail2web.com/ . >>