NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: sextant index error measurement
From: Frank Reed CT
Date: 2006 Nov 4, 19:23 EST
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to NavList@fer3.com
To , send email to NavList-@fer3.com
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
From: Frank Reed CT
Date: 2006 Nov 4, 19:23 EST
Bill you wrote:
"On topic he did mention, if I recall correctly,
that in some parts of the USA traditional methods (optical?) had to take a
break during the hottest part of the day due to refraction. I failed to
mention that as I trust it will affect both beams almost uniformly, and it
is better to be thought an idiot than to open one's mouth and prove it."
that in some parts of the USA traditional methods (optical?) had to take a
break during the hottest part of the day due to refraction. I failed to
mention that as I trust it will affect both beams almost uniformly, and it
is better to be thought an idiot than to open one's mouth and prove it."
You're correct that you do not need to worry about refraction in this
case, primarily because the distance is so short. Refraction will bend
a laser beam downward by anywhere from one to several tenths of a minute of arc
in one nautical mile of lateral distance. Over the few hundred feet of distance
involved in this test, the deflection will always be less than a tenth of a
minute of arc. And of course, the differential deflection of two beams
side-by-side will be smaller again by an order of magnitude. So it's completely
negligible.
Just for fun, let's imagine an extreme exception... Take your sextant
out to a parking lot with nice black asphalt surfacing on a calm summer day just
after sunrise. Set it up vertically just above the surface and wait. As the Sun
heats the surface a layer of hot air will form over the parking lot. Without
wind, the hot layer will not immediately mix fully with the cooler air
above it. The density gradient will be substantial, and the refraction will be
measurably different. As the doctor says in the old joke, "Vell, don't do
that!".
-FER
42.0N 87.7W, or 41.4N 72.1W.
www.HistoricalAtlas.com/lunars
42.0N 87.7W, or 41.4N 72.1W.
www.HistoricalAtlas.com/lunars
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to NavList@fer3.com
To , send email to NavList-@fer3.com
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---