NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: strange legal opinion in usa
From: Philip Lange
Date: 2006 Sep 21, 11:28 -0500
From: Philip Lange
Date: 2006 Sep 21, 11:28 -0500
The case was discussed on another list. It turned out that
the rulling was about flooded over land. Not tidal. In other words, of
your land was flooded over you still owned it and any one who floated a
boat over it to fish without your permission was
trespassing.
Least that's the way I understood it.
Philip
At 12:14 PM 9/21/2006, you wrote:
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to NavList@fer3.com
To , send email to NavList-@fer3.com
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Least that's the way I understood it.
Philip
At 12:14 PM 9/21/2006, you wrote:
I dont own hunting equipment nor do I hunt. Neither do I fish. But assuming the ruling applies to those two categories the potential impacts are far reaching.
Without going to far afield, consider some kids out fishing in a small boat, this ruling would make them liable for fishing too near shore and failing to be observant of the tide. Ridiculous!
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to NavList@fer3.com
To , send email to NavList-@fer3.com
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
