NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
GPS
From: Barry Hudson
Date: 1998 Jan 18, 12:28 PM
From: Barry Hudson
Date: 1998 Jan 18, 12:28 PM
Geoff put forth a good argument for GPS. On the ocean we don't need that kind of accuracy to know that we are in a 5 mile radius is quite good enough until we approach land then we need increased accuracy. Of course we usually get very accurate sextant positions if the weather conditions are OK. The larger the vessel the more accurate your positions. Speed in working a sight; depends on your experience and method used. I have had 4 stars plotted within a time of 8 min. and that include the observation. GPS is a marvellous piece of equipment however problems such as malfunction breakdown on board are ever present possibilies and I believe there is comet coming with it's associated debris. This has been publicised in a number of tech. mags. and there is a possibility of comet debris doing damage to sattelites. So we need a backup for GPS and that is Celestial Nav. and if we have an overcast day then we use DR and also if we are nearing land we sweat it out until we pick up something on radar and the echo sounder. Having GPS is great but we need that Celestial backup and in any case we purists would't neglect our morning, daytime and evening sights for anything. Regards, Barrie Hudson. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-= TO UNSUBSCRIBE, send this message to majordomo@ronin.com: =-=-= navigation =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-