NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Lunar distance accuracy
From: Bill B
Date: 2007 Oct 26, 05:27 -0400
From: Bill B
Date: 2007 Oct 26, 05:27 -0400
> Frank, > >> Yes. The human eye certainly has higher resolution in daylight. I think we >> discussed this at length a couple of years ago, didn't we? > > Sure. But as it always happens, there was a long > discussion with different opinions and I don't remember > whether it came to a definite conclusion. > > One alternative explanation offered was that > the eye pupil becomes larger in the darkness:-) > > Alex. In the process of moving while trying to care for an aging mother hours away, so please excuse my lack of specific detail. Frank pointed out an excellent article in, if memory serves, Sky & Telescope a while back that dealt with corrective surgery, night eyeglass prescriptions, and the lack of ability to resolve a point source as the eye night adapts. Please check the archives and/or read the article. Unless you are a submariner trying to distinguish a horizon in the dead of night, I feel there is a strong case to be made for keeping the pupil small. Some list members I have met personally find an IE check with a star very difficult. Ironically, night myopia appears to decrease with age. Some texts (Bauer?) recommend popping out and and doing the observation so one does not strain the eye. Unless absolutely necessary, I try to keep the pupil as small as possible and get better results. I would be hard pressed to make a case for depth of field being a factor for a target that is, for all practical purposes, at infinity. Bill --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to NavList@fer3.com To , send email to NavList-@fer3.com -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---